123Reports.Com
The Internet's #1 Source For Help With
College-Level Research Reports !

...On-file papers are reduced to only $11.95/pg...
**Customized research is just $29.95/pg**
---Both services include FREE bibliography pages!!!---

Legal Memo / N.J. Supreme Court Decision # 1a
[ send me this report ]
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors Memo reviews and analyzes an key 1960 New Jersey Decision regarding manufacturer and dealer liability. Rather than strictly adhering to the fact that a sales contract was signed, the Court in this case looked at the predicament in which a buyer is placed when involved in such a large, technical purchase as an automobile. The court also examined marketing philosophy and the media used to advertise to better decide whether or not the defendants could truly be relieved of the responsibilities that the contract as claimed.
Filename: Legalme2.wps

Legal Memo / N.J. Supreme Court Decision # 1b
[ send me this report ]
Broken down into sections, this is essentially a shorter version of Legalme2.wps, in which the analyst looks at legal issues and social policy to ultimately justify the Court's decision in this particular case.
Filename: Legalme3.wps

Legal Memorandum
[ send me this report ]
A 7 page closed objective legal memorandum regarding a whether or not an insurance company should pay double indemnity for a death in which the deceased died because he placed a noose around his neck and cut off oxygen to his brain during the act of masturbation, suffocating when a pulley system jammed. The writer cites relevant case law and discusses the case relevant to a Missouri jurisdiction. No bibliography provided.
Filename: khlmemo.rtf

Legal Memorandum
[ send me this report ]
This 11 page paper is an example of a legal memorandum for a fictitious case involving Royal Imperial Mutual Alliance Consolidated Insurance and an insured motorist. This legal memorandum applies Indiana State laws to the issue of uninsured motorists in the family of insured motorists, and supports the clients supposition of a prevailing judgment action against the insured. No bibliography.
Filename: LegMemo.wps

Legal Precedents and Illegal Proceedings
[ send me this report ]
This 5 page paper gives four examples where improper procedures, not lack of evidence, ruined a case, and whether the arguments used were correct. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: HVLegPrc.rtf

LIBYAN FOREIGN BANK VERSUS BANKERS TRUST COMPANY/ A CASE BRIEF
[ send me this report ]
This 3 page paper is a case brief on the 1987 case between the Libyan Arab Bank versus the Bankers Trust company of New York and London. Overview and conclusions discussed. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: MBliblaw.rtf

Mary Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-60/00)
[ send me this report ]
This 4 page paper is an outline of the case of Mary Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-60/00). The writer outlines the facts and then looks at the decision made by the European Court. The bibliography cites 3 sources.
Filename: TEcarptr.rtf

Memo: Aggravated Menacing Case
[ send me this report ]
10 pages in length. Was Jack Flemming's intent to hurt his girlfriend, Trish, or was he merely venting the frustration of his very first heartbreak? Regardless of his ultimate intent, if any, he still was responsible for placing the threatening words where they could be openly viewed, which gave sufficient cause for concern toward aggravated menacing, violating R.C. 2903.21(A). No bibliography.
Filename: TLClegal2.wps

Merge Case: A Legal Brief
[ send me this report ]
A 2 page paper which presents a legal brief of the case concerning the Merge case. No additional sources cited.
Filename: RAlbmerge.wps

MIMA v Bhardwai: Australian Case Law
[ send me this report ]
This 5 page paper outlines the case of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (MIMA) v Bhardwai (2002), HCA 11 (14 March 2002). This paper outlines the basic elements of this case. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: MHBhardw.rtf

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
[ send me this report ]
A 1 page brief of the case involving the police detainment and questioning of four defendants without advising them of their right to silence or their right to an attorney. Determined that such interrogation did not adequately provide for the Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, the “right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will”. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPlawBr5.wps

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Just in all Cases?
[ send me this report ]
A 4 page exploration of this critical case. The author contends that the overall good that is accomplished by the Miranda requirement outweighs the fact that occasionally criminals escape prosecution because they were not read their rights at the time of apprehension and arrest. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPlwMir2.rtf

Enter One or More KEYWORDS:

*Remember! If you can't find what you need, CUSTOMIZED research is also available!